Radical Philosophy Review 4 (1/2):95-101 (2001)
Popular images of rights almost always emphasize their protective qualities. But who is really protected? In this paper it is argued that contemporary rights talk, because of faulty underlying assumptions, systematically favors prejudice and big property interests. Further, once the mistaken assumptions are surrendered, and it is realized that all rights are affirmative, a less systematically misleading debate can be created within the realm of rights discourse
|Keywords||rights affirmative action politics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Proliferation of Rights: Moral Progress or Empty Rhetoric?Carl Wellman - 1999 - Westview Press.
The Language of Rights.Michael Baur - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:89-98.
The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning: ``Rights'' Versus ``Needs''. [REVIEW]Jeremy Waldron - 2000 - Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):115-135.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #347,264 of 2,153,858 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #225,089 of 2,153,858 )
How can I increase my downloads?