Gender in Translation: Beyond Monolingualism

philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 9 (1):1-25 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Anglophone theoretical reflections on gender often assume the generalizability of their claims without first asking whether “gender” as a term exists, or exists in the same way, in other languages. Some of the resistance to the entry of “gender” as a term into non-Anglophone contexts emerges from a resistance to English or, indeed, from within the syntax of a language in which questions of gender are settled through verb inflections or implied reference. A larger form of resistance, of course, has to do with fears that the category will itself release forms of sexual freedom and challenges to existing hierarchies within the second language. The well-organized political attack on gender and gender studies now occurring throughout the world has many sources, and that is not the focus of this essay. This essay maintains that there can be no theory of gender without translation and that Anglophone monolingualism too often assumes that English forms a sufficient basis for theoretical claims about gender. Further, because the contemporary usage of gender emerges from a coinage introduced by sexologists and reappropriated by feminists, it proves to be a term that is bound up with grammatical innovation and syntactical challenges from the start. Without an understanding of translation—its practice and its limits—there can be no gender studies within a global framework. Finally, the process of becoming gendered, or changing genders, requires translation in order to communicate the new terms for recognizing new modalities of gender. Thus, translation is a constitutive part of any theory of gender that seeks to be multilingual and that accepts the historically dynamic character of languages. This framework can help facilitate a way of recognizing different genders, and different accounts of gender identity as requiring both translation and its limits. Without translation and historical coinage, there is no way to understand the dynamic and changing category of gender and the resistances it now encounters.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,245

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking Gender in the Age of the Beijing Consensus.Petrus Liu - 2021 - Feminist Studies 47 (2):341-371.
Beyond Pronouns: Gender Visibility and Neutrality across Languages.Iz González Vázquez, A. Klieber & Martina Rosola - 2024 - In Ernest Lepore & Luvell Anderson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 320-346.
Genos, sex, gender and genre.Stella Sandford - 2018 - In Kirsten Malmkjær, Adriana Serban & Fransiska Louwagie (eds.), Key cultural texts in translation. John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 9-24.
A Probe Into Social Sex.Ya-jun Qu - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:11-15.
Gender Without Identity.Avgi Saketopoulou & Ann Pellegrini - 2023 - Unconscious in Translation.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-22

Downloads
330 (#76,285)

6 months
57 (#93,801)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Judith Butler
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Continental feminism.Jennifer Hansen - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Continental feminism.Ann J. Cahill - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gender as a proxy: Diagnosing and resisting carceral genderisms.Sarah Franklin - 2022 - European Journal of Women's Studies 29 (1_suppl):132S-139S.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references