American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):357-367 (2006)
This article considers the question of the responsibility that present day generations bear as a result of the actions of their ancestors. Is it morally significant that we share a national identity with those responsible for the perpetration of historic injustice? The article argues that we can be guilty of wrongdoing stemming from past wrongdoing if we are members of nations that are responsible for an ongoing failure to fulfil rectificatory duties. This rests upon three claims: that the failure to fulfil rectificatory duties is unjust; that nations can bear collective responsibility for the actions of their leaders; and that nations are comprised of overlapping generations rather than successive generations. The claim that present day parties should apologise for historic injustice is then considered, and it is argued that such an apology is best understood in relation to an ongoing failure to fulfil rectificatory duties
|Keywords||historic injustice ancestors responsibility nations national identity collective responsibility leadership overlapping generations successive generations apology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rectifying International Injustice: Principles of Compensation and Restitution Between Nations.Daniel Butt - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Responsibility for Past Injustice: How to Shift the Burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
Historic Injustice, Group Membership and Harm to Individuals: Defending Claims for Historic Justice From the Non-Identity Problem.Ori J. Herstein - 2009 - Harvard Journal of Racial and Ethnic Justice 25:229.
Collective Responsibility and National Responsibility.Roland Pierik - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):465-483.
Historic Justice and the Non-Identity Problem: The Limitations of the Subsequent-Wrong Solution and Towards a New Solution. [REVIEW]Ori J. Herstein - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (5):505 - 531.
Historic Corporate Responsibility.Judith Schrempf & Guido Palazzo - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:26-37.
Parenting and Intergenerational Justice: Why Collective Obligations Towards Future Generations Take Second Place to Individual Responsibility. [REVIEW]M. L. J. Wissenburg - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (6):557-573.
Future Generations and Business Ethics.Ronald Jeurissen & Gerard Keijzers - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):47-69.
'The Cost of a Wounded Society': Reparations and the Illusion of Reconciliation.Andrea Durbach - unknown
Conservation, Foresight, and the Future Generations Problem.Steve Vanderheiden - 2006 - Inquiry 49 (4):337 – 352.
Can Collective Responsibility for Perpetrated Evil Persist Over Generations?Ton Van Den Beld - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):181-200.
Human Rights and Duties to Alleviate Environmental Injustice: The Domestic Case.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - unknown
Intergenerational Rights: A Philosophical Examination.Makoto Usami - 2011 - In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 5. Athens Institute of Education and Research.
The Non-Identity Problem, Collective Rights, and the Threshold Conception of Harm.Makoto Usami - 2011 - Tokyo Institute of Technology Department of Social Engineering Discussion Paper (2011-04):1-17.
Added to index2011-04-19
Total downloads135 ( #34,161 of 2,154,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)42 ( #6,868 of 2,154,182 )
How can I increase my downloads?