Social and Legal Studies 21 (2):227-242 (2012)
AbstractThis article addresses the claim that some contemporary states may possess obligations to pay reparations as a result of the lasting effects of a particular form of historic imperialism: colonialism. Claims about the harms and benefits caused by colonialism must make some kind of comparison between the world as it currently is, and a counterfactual state where the injustice which characterised so much of historic interaction between colonisers and the colonised did not occur. Rather than imagining a world a world where there was no such interaction, this article maintains that the appropriate counterfactual is one where relations between different communities were characterized by an absence of domination and exploitation. This means that current day states may possess reparative duties which are much more extensive than is often supposed.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
The Beneficiary Pays Principle and Strict Liability: Exploring the Normative Significance of Causal Relations.Alexandra Couto - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (9):2169-2189.
Towards a Shared Redress: Achieving Historical Justice Through Democratic Deliberation.Sara Amighetti & Alasia Nuti - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (4):385-405.
Colonialism and Postcolonialism.Daniel Butt - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 892-898.
Similar books and articles
'The Passage From Imperialism to Empire': A Commentary on Empire by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri.Peter Green - 2002 - Historical Materialism 10 (1):29-77.
Apologising for the Past: German Science and Nazi Medicine.Damian Grace - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):31-42.
Historical Justice in International Perspective: How Societies Are Trying to Right the Wrongs of the Past.Manfred Berg & Bernd Schaefer (eds.) - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
“The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History.Dun Zhang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):631-651.
The Middle Empire, a Distant Empire, an Empire Without Neighbors.Vadime Elisseeff & Hans Kaal - 1963 - Diogenes 11 (42):60-64.
The Empire in Crisis (O.) Hekster, (G.) De Kleijn, (D.) Slootjes (Edd.) Crises and the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Nijmegen, June 20–24, 2006). (Impact of Empire 7.) Pp. Xiv + 448, Figs, Maps, Pl. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007. Cased, €129, US$179. ISBN: 978-90-04-16050-. [REVIEW]Meaghan Mcevoy - 2009 - The Classical Review 59 (1):222-.
Guessing the Future of the Past: Derek Turner, Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Realism Debate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.Ben Jeffares - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):125-142.
Unsuccessful Conquest and Successful Subordination. A Contribution to the Theory of Intersocial Relations.Krzysztof Brzechczyn - 1993 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 33:445-456.
‘To Serve and Protect’: The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros. [REVIEW]Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):49-71.