Reactive Rules Alone Cannot Construct Cognition

Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):34-35 (2013)
Open peer commentary on the article “Exploration of the Functional Properties of Interaction: Computer Models and Pointers for Theory” by Etienne B. Roesch, Matthew Spencer, Slawomir J. Nasuto, Thomas Tanay & J. Mark Bishop. Upshot: Although the authors investigate a form of distributed swarm intelligence and solve some problems with it – including sorting and summing – the major goal, which is constructing cognition, cannot be achieved by this approach alone. I propose that anticipatory mechanisms have the potential to construct cognition and may very well be combined with swarm intelligence principles
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,555
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Single Agents Can Be Constructivist Too.O. L. Georgeon & S. Hassas - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):40-42.
Self-Organization in Brains.P. Cariani - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):35-38.
The Mind Is Not In the Brain.J. Stewart - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 4 (1):17-18.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
6 ( #691,859 of 2,302,919 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #273,853 of 2,302,919 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature