Reply to Further Defenses of Incentivization

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (6):463-471 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a previous article, we challenged the “incentivization view” held by J. P. Smit, Filip Buekens, and Stan du Plessis as failing to cover social phenomena involving strict joint actions. The authors’ response to our criticism seriously misstates our main point. We have therefore, as briefly and sharply as we can, restated the problem in this note.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to Do Things Without Words - A Theory of Declarations.J. P. Smit & Filip Buekens - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (3):235-254.
How Not to Save Searle: A Reply to Weber’s Reply.R. D'Amico & W. Butchard - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):445-448.
Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses.Re’em Segev - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):57-76.
Divine Freedom and Free Will Defenses.W. Paul Franks - 2015 - Heythrop Journal 56 (1):108-119.
Getting rights right: Reply to Van duffel.G. E. Morton - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (1):109-116.
Self-Gift: The Heart of Humanae vitae.Janet E. Smith, John S. Grabowski, J. Budziszewski & Maria Fedoryka - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (3):449-474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-31

Downloads
15 (#809,217)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert D'Amico
University of Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Minds, Brains and Science.John R. Searle - 1984 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Groups as Agents.Deborah Perron Tollefsen - 2015 - Malden, MA: Polity.
A reply to my critics.George Edward Moore - 1942 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The philosophy of G. E. Moore. New York,: Tudor Pub. Co..

View all 8 references / Add more references