The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence
As Newton realized, his absolute space was a ‘conspiracy of nature’ in the sense that his laws dictated that nobody could discover who, among all possible observers (in various states of motion relative to one another), was at rest in absolute space. So absolute space was an unverifiable element of his theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Newton and the Leibniz--Clarke Correspondence.Domenico Bertolini Meli - 2002 - In I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press.
The Epistemological Roots of the Dispute Over Time and Freedom in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence.Michael Wenisch - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):201-220.
Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence.Ezio Vailati - 1997 - Oup Usa.
The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Samuel Clarke - 1956 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: Together with Extracts From Newton's Principia and Opticks.Samuel Clarke - 1956 - Barnes & Noble.
Newton's Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space.Ori Belkind - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.
Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz.Richard Arthur - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #75,175 of 2,154,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,759 of 2,154,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?