Trivial Languages

Acta Analytica 33 (1):1-17 (2018)
Authors
Arvid Båve
Stockholm University
Abstract
I here present and defend what I call the Triviality Theory of Truth, to be understood in analogy with Matti Eklund’s Inconsistency Theory of Truth. A specific formulation of is defended and compared with alternatives found in the literature. A number of objections against the proposed notion of meaning-constitutivity are discussed and held inconclusive. The main focus, however, is on the problem, discussed at length by Gupta and Belnap, that speakers do not accept epistemically neutral conclusions of Curry derivations. I first argue that the facts about speakers’ reactions to such Curry derivations do not constitute a problem for the Triviality Theory specifically. Rather, they follow from independent, uncontroversial facts. I then propose a solution which coheres with the theory as I understand it. Finally, I consider a normative reading of their objection and offer a response.
Keywords truth  trivialism  inconsistency theory  Eklund  Scharp  Burgess  Tarski  Classical logic  Dialethism  Priest
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-017-0328-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):455-464.
Normative Requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.
Ceteris Paribus Post.John Earman, John T. Roberts & Sheldon Smith - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):281-301.
Dispositions and Subjunctives.Jesse R. Steinberg - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):323 - 341.
A Study of Concepts.Robert Hanna & Christopher Peacocke - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (3):541.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Formulating Deflationism.Arvid Båve - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3287-3305.
Truth: The Deflationary Theory Vs. The Semantic Theory.Glen Adam Hoffmann - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox.Douglas Patterson - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):387 - 422.
On Using Inconsistent Expressions.Arvid Båve - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (1):133-148.
Moral Contextualism and the Problem of Triviality.Daan Evers - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):285-297.
Disarming a Paradox of Validity.Hartry Field - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (1):1-19.
A Deflationary Response to the Ontological Problem.Jennifer Lynn Faust - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
The Theory of Meaning.Russell Eliot Dale - 1996 - Dissertation, City University of New York

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-18

Total downloads
34 ( #188,569 of 2,293,801 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #108,085 of 2,293,801 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature