Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (4):554-567 (1999)
Plausible principles on truth seem to yield contradictory conclusions about paradoxical sentences such as the Strengthened Liar. Those who take the contextualist approach, such as Parsons and Burge, attempt to justify the seemingly contradictory conclusions by arguing that the natural reasoning that leads to them involves some kind of contextual shift that makes them compatible. This paper argues that one cannot take this approach to give a proper treatment of infinite descending chains of semantic attributions. It also examines a related approach taken by Gaifman and argues that it has the same problem
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Contextualist Resolutions of Philosophical Debates.Martin Montminy - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):571-590.
Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.Haixia Zhong - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788.
Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox.Douglas Patterson - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):387 - 422.
Some Descending Chains of Incomplete Modal Logics.Ming Xu - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (3):265 - 283.
Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism.D. Pritchard - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):19-55.
Why Paraconsistent Logic Can Only Tell Half the Truth.Joachim Bromand - 2002 - Mind 111 (444):741-749.
Epistemological Contextualism: A Semantic Perspective.Claudia Bianchi & Nicla Vassallo - 2005 - In B. Kokinov A. Dey (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Springer. pp. 41--54.
Painted Leaves, Context, and Semantic Analysis.Stefano Predelli - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):351 - 374.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads14 ( #334,668 of 2,172,023 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,023 )
How can I increase my downloads?