In Sacha Golob & Jens Timmermann (eds.), The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 112-124 (2017)
AbstractG.E.M. Anscombe famously claimed that ‘the Hebrew-Christian ethic’ differs from consequentialist theories in its ability to ground the claim that killing the innocent is intrinsically wrong. According to Anscombe, this is owing to its legal character, rooted in the divine decrees of the Torah. Divine decrees confer a particular moral sense of ‘ought’ by which this and other act-types can be ‘wrong’ regardless of their consequences, she maintained. There is, of course, a potentially devastating counter-example. Within the Torah, Abraham is apparently commanded by God to slaughter and set fire to his innocent son, Isaac. For attempting to do so, he is praised in the Biblical passage and by later Jewish and Christian commentators. This paper examines rabbinic and early Christian analyses of the story and finds that it was not unambiguously held by these interpreters that God absolutely prohibits killing the innocent, until the time of Augustine, whose position on the story evolved over time.
Similar books and articles
A Short History of Jewish Ethics: Conduct and Character in the Context of Covenant.Alan Mittleman - 2012 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Is a Messianic Political Ethic Possible? Recent Work by and About John Howard Yoder. [REVIEW]P. Travis Kroeker - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (1):139 - 174.
Self, Subject, and Chosen Subjection: Rabbinic Ethics and Comparative Possibilities.Jonathan Wyn Schofer - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):255 - 291.
Elizabeth Anscombe e la svolta normativa del 1958.Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2010 - In Juan Andrés Mercado (ed.), Elisabeth Anscombe e la psicologia morale. Roma, Italy: Armando. pp. 43-80.
Jewish Law in Gentile Churches: Halakhah and the Beginning of Christian Public Ethics.Markus Bockmuehl - 2000 - Baker Academic.
Early Christian Ethics in Interaction with Jewish and Greco-Roman Contexts.J. W. van Henten & Jozef Verheyden (eds.) - 2012 - Brill.
Divine Command Ethics: Jewish and Christian Perspectives.Michael J. Harris - 2003 - Routledgecurzon.
Singing the Ethos of God: On the Place of Christian Ethics in Scripture.Brian Brock - 2007 - William B. Eerdmans.
Anscombe on the Mesmeric Force of ‘Ought’ and a Spurious Kind of Moral Realism.Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2017 - Etica E Politica 19 (2):51-86.
Between Mt. Moriah and Mt. Golgotha: How is Christian Ethics Possible?Ilsup Ahn - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4):629-652.
The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics.Thomas Williams (ed.) - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
Bonhoeffer and the Bible in Christian Ethics: Psalm 119, The Mandates, and Ethics as a 'Way'.Brian Brock - 2005 - Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (3):7-29.
The Substance of Jewish Business Ethics.Moses L. Pava - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):603-617.
Theological Ethics and Global Dynamic: In the Time of Many Worlds; Humanity Before God: Contemporary Faces of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Ethics; The Blackwell Companion to Religious Ethics.Harlan Beckley - 2008 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 28 (2):256-262.
Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going on to Ethics.Cora Diamond - 2019 - London, England: Harvard University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the Good Life. Oup Usa.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Perception, Sensibility, and Moral Motivation in Augustine: A Stoic-Platonic Synthesis.Sarah Catherine Byers - 2013 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.