Does thought imply ought?

Analysis 67 (4):277–285 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

N.B. Dr Bykvist is now based at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford. The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
584 (#28,997)

6 months
18 (#134,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Anandi Hattiangadi
Stockholm University
Krister Bykvist
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence.Jonas Olson - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Russellian Retreat.Clayton Littlejohn - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (3pt3):293-320.
An Epistemic Non-Consequentialism.Kurt L. Sylvan - 2020 - The Philosophical Review 129 (1):1-51.
The Normativity of Belief.Conor McHugh & Daniel Whiting - 2014 - Analysis 74 (4):698-713.
Should I Believe the Truth?Daniel Whiting - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (2):213-224.

View all 93 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Normative requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.
Moral dilemmas.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1988 - New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
The aim of belief.Ralph Wedgwood - 2002 - Philosophical Perspectives 16:267-97.

View all 20 references / Add more references