Reply to Lebech or the ontological humility of the lawyer faced with philosophical consistency

Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):348-349 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Replying to the criticisms of Lebech, the author tries, regarding the issue of embryo research, to draw a line between what could be an international legal approach and what is a philosophical ontological quest. It is then up to the reader to decide if, and how far, these two different approaches can be complementary

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Standing humbly before nature.Lisa Gerber - 2002 - Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):39-53.
The Philosophy of Edith Stein.Mette Lebech - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):412-414.
Reading Stein—Some Guidelines for the Perplexed.Mette Lebech - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):103-112.
Modernizing the Virtue of Humility.G. Alex Sinha - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):259 - 274.
Mystery and Humility.Ian James Kidd & Guy Bennett-Hunter (eds.) - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
50 (#311,236)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references