Philosophical Studies 178 (9):3017-3026 (2020)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
This comment mainly examines Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne’s preferred framework for examining whether narrow content is viable, arguing that their framework is not well-suited to the task; once a more traditional framework is adopted, Y&H’s case against internalism is strengthened.
|
| Keywords | narrow content internalism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11098-020-01548-2 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought.Robert Stalnaker - 1999 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Logical Form of Action Sentences.Donald Davidson - 1967 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 81--95.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Naive Realism V Representationalism: An Argument From Science.Adam Pautz - forthcoming - In Jonathan Cohen & Brian McLaughlin (eds.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind (eds. Cohen and McLaughlin).
Reply to Byrne.Juhani Yli-Vakkuri & John Hawthorne - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (9):3049-3054.
Similar books and articles
The Nature of Content: A Critique of Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne.Sarah Sawyer - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Narrow Content, by Juhani Yli-Vakkuri and John Hawthorne. [REVIEW]Sarah Sawyer - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):976-984.
There is No Viable Notion of Narrow Content.Sarah Sawyer - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 20-34.
Narrow Content.Robert Stalnaker - 1990 - In C. Anthony Anderson & Joseph Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: Csli.
Narrow Content: Fodor's Folly.Fred Adams, David Drebushenko, Gary Fuller & Robert Stecker - 1990 - Mind and Language 5 (3):213-29.
What Narrow Content is Not.Ned Block - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
How “Meaning” Became “Narrow Content”.Paweł Grabarczyk - 2016 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 46 (1):155-171.
Narrow Content: Motivations and Problems.Scott Francis Walden - 1994 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-09-11
Total views
329 ( #31,055 of 2,498,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #32,442 of 2,498,762 )
2020-09-11
Total views
329 ( #31,055 of 2,498,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #32,442 of 2,498,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
