In S. Lloyd (ed.), Interpreting Hobbes's Political Philosophy. New York, NY, USA: pp. 206-222 (2019)

Authors
Michael Byron
Kent State University
Abstract
Heir to Augustine’s and Anselm’s encounters with the Psalmist’s fool, Hobbes s confronts his own foolish interlocutor in Leviathan. This Foole says in his heart: there is no justice. Hobbes rebuts the unjust Foole’s objection by defending the reasonableness of justice. Readers’ ideas about the adequacy of Hobbes’s response to the Foole vary according to their views about what reason, justice, and covenant-keeping require. A confounding and little-remarked feature of this passage in Leviathan is Hobbes’s claim that his unjust Foole is the same with respect to his atheism as the Psalmist’s fool. This identity, far from being accidental or coincidental, is crucial to an adequate understanding of the Foole’s objection and Hobbes’s rebuttal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hobbes and the Foole.Kinch Hoekstra - 1997 - Political Theory 25 (5):620-654.
The Invisible Foole.Peter Vanderschraaf - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (1):37-58.
Interpreting Hobbes's Political Philosophy.Sharon Lloyd (ed.) - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
A Catalogue of Mistaken Interests: Reflections on the Desired and the Desirable.Malcolm Murray - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):1 – 23.
Hobbes’ Reply to the Fool.David Gilboa - 2000 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 3.
A Very British Hobbes, or A More European Hobbes?Patricia Springborg - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):368-386.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-21

Total views
2 ( #1,423,050 of 2,462,500 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,164 of 2,462,500 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes