Abstract
Indigenous peoples are disproportionally vulnerable to climate change. At the same time, they possess valuable knowledge for fair and sustainable climate adaptation planning and policymaking. Yet Indigenous peoples and knowledges are often excluded from or underrepresented within adaptation plans and policies. In this paper we ask whether the concept of epistemic injustice can be applied to the context of climate adaptation and the underrepresentation of Indigenous knowledges within adaptation policies and strategies. In recent years, the concept of epistemic injustice has gained prominence, indicating that someone has been unfairly discriminated against in their capacity as a knower. We argue that many climate adaptation policies are epistemically unjust towards Indigenous peoples because of the underrepresentation of Indigenous knowledges by showing how the case of Indigenous knowledges in climate adaptation planning and policy satisfies five conditions of epistemic injustice. We further consider what challenges there are to integrating local and Indigenous knowledges within development in general, and climate adaptation strategies in particular and how these can be addressed. Whether the lack of Indigenous knowledges in climate adaptation policies constitutes an epistemic injustice matters because an injustice denotes an unfair advantage to one group – whether by design or default – that ought to be remedied and redressed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-022-10301-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.Kristie Dotson - 2014 - Social Epistemology 28 (2):115-138.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Loss of Epistemic Self-Determination in the Anthropocene.Ian Werkheiser - 2017 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (2):156-167.
Fair Adaptation to Climate Change.Jouni Paavola & Neil Adger - 2006 - Ecological Economics 56:594–609.
Labor Migration and Climate Change Adaptation.Jamie Draper - forthcoming - American Political Science Review.
Resiliens i et globalt klimaperspektiv.Mikkel Fugl Eskjær - 2016 - Slagmark - Tidsskrift for Idéhistorie 73:65-80.
Mitigation, Adaptation or Climate Engineering?Claire Granier & Guy P. Brasseur - 2013 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14 (1):1-20.
Values in Climate Policy.David Morrow - 2019 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
Adapting to Climate Change: What We Owe to Other Animals.Angie Pepper - 2019 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (4):592-607.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-06-08

Total views
3 ( #1,362,757 of 2,519,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,383 of 2,519,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes