Can there be a Bayesian explanationism? On the prospects of a productive partnership

Synthese 194 (4):1245–1272 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I consider the relationship between Inference to the Best Explanation and Bayesianism, both of which are well-known accounts of the nature of scientific inference. In Sect. 2, I give a brief overview of Bayesianism and IBE. In Sect. 3, I argue that IBE in its most prominently defended forms is difficult to reconcile with Bayesianism because not all of the items that feature on popular lists of “explanatory virtues”—by means of which IBE ranks competing explanations—have confirmational import. Rather, some of the items that feature on these lists are “informational virtues”—properties that do not make a hypothesis \ more probable than some competitor \ given evidence E, but that, roughly-speaking, give that hypothesis greater informative content. In Sect. 4, I consider as a response to my argument a recent version of compatibilism which argues that IBE can provide further normative constraints on the objectively correct probability function. I argue that this response does not succeed, owing to the difficulty of defending with any generality such further normative constraints. Lastly, in Sect. 5, I propose that IBE should be regarded, not as a theory of scientific inference, but rather as a theory of when we ought to “accept” H, where the acceptability of H is fixed by the goals of science and concerns whether H is worthy of commitment as research program. In this way, IBE and Bayesianism, as I will show, can be made compatible, and thus the Bayesian and the proponent of IBE can be friends

Similar books and articles

Two dogmas of strong objective bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
Bayesian Scientific Methodology: A Naturalistic Approach.Yeongseo Yeo - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
The Scope of Bayesian Reasoning.Henry Kyburg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:139 - 152.
Inferential Evidence.Jeffrey Dunn - 2014 - American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):203-213.
Bayesianism without the Black box.Mark Kaplan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (1):48-69.
Inference to the Best Explanation and Bayesianism.Stathis Psillos - 2004 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 11:83-91.
Levi and the Defense of Bayesianism.Howard Hugh Harriott - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Bayesianism in mathematics.David Corfield - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 175--201.


Added to PP

1,027 (#13,155)

6 months
128 (#30,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Cabrera
University of Wisconsin, Madison (PhD)

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1973 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 142 references / Add more references