Reasons for Comfort and Discomfort with Pharmacological Enhancement of Cognitive, Affective, and Social Domains

Neuroethics 8 (2):93-106 (2015)

Authors
Nicholas Fitz
University of British Columbia
Peter B. Reiner
University of British Columbia
Abstract
The debate over the propriety of cognitive enhancement evokes both enthusiasm and worry. To gain further insight into the reasons that people may have for endorsing or eschewing pharmacological enhancement, we used empirical tools to explore public attitudes towards PE of twelve cognitive, affective, and social domains. Participants from Canada and the United States were recruited using Mechanical Turk and were randomly assigned to read one vignette that described an individual who uses a pill to enhance a single domain. After reading the vignette, participants were asked how comfortable they were with the individual using the enhancement. People were significantly more comfortable when they read about enhancement of certain CAS domains than others. We found a modest negative correlation between comfort level and the degree to which the PE was perceived as changing core features of the person. We also found a modest correlation between comfort level and the degree to which the PE was perceived as improving success in life. Finally, using a sequential mixed method technique, we found that participants who felt uncomfortable about PE use overwhelmingly focused on a lack of need and, to a lesser degree, expressed concerns about safety; those who felt comfortable about PE use most frequently mentioned the safety of the pill and its ability to provide a positive outcome. The data provide novel insights into public enthusiasms and concerns over the use of PE
Keywords Enhancement  Experimental neuroethics  Public attitudes  Cognitive  Social  Affective
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-014-9222-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,395
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - Dover Publications.
Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century.Neil Levy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroenhancing Public Health.David Shaw - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics (6):2012-101300.
Neuroethics.Walter Glannon - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (1):37–52.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Psychopharmacological Enhancement.Walter Glannon - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (1):45-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-10

Total views
28 ( #337,002 of 2,291,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #398,154 of 2,291,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature