String Theory, Non-Empirical Theory Assessment, and the Context of Pursuit

Synthese 198:3671–3699 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I offer an analysis of the radical disagreement over the adequacy of string theory. The prominence of string theory despite its notorious lack of empirical support is sometimes explained as a troubling case of science gone awry, driven largely by sociological mechanisms such as groupthink (e.g. Smolin 2006). Others, such as Dawid (2013), explain the controversy by positing a methodological revolution of sorts, according to which string theorists have quietly turned to nonempirical methods of theory assessment given the technological inability to directly test the theory. The appropriate response, according to Dawid, is to acknowledge this development and widen the canons of acceptable scientific methods. As I’ll argue, however, the current situation in fundamental physics does not require either of these responses. Rather, as I’ll suggest, much of the controversy stems from a failure to properly distinguish the “context of justification” from the “context of pursuit”. Both those who accuse string theorists of betraying the scientific method and those who advocate an enlarged conception of scientific methodology objectionably conflate epistemic justification with judgements of pursuit-worthiness. Once we get clear about this distinction and about the different norms governing the two contexts, the current situation in fundamental physics becomes much less puzzling. After defending this diagnosis of the controversy, I’ll show how the argument patterns that have been posited by Dawid as constituting an emergent methodological revolution in science are better off if reworked as arguments belonging to the context of pursuit.

Similar books and articles

String Theory and the Scientific Method.Richard Dawid - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Chronical Incompleteness, Final Theory Claims, and the Lack of Free Parameters in String Theory.Richard Dawid - 2020 - In Nick Huggett, Keizo Matsubara & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Beyond Spacetime: The Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. pp. 237-256.
Experiment and theory building.Lydia Patton - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):235-246.
String theory and general methodology: A mutual evaluation.Lars-Göran Johansson & Keizo Matsubara - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (3):199-210.
String and M-Theory: Answering the Critics. [REVIEW]M. J. Duff - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (1):182-200.
Doubts for Dawid's non-empirical theory assessment.Cristin Chall - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63:128-135.
String Theory & the Scientific Method.Fedde Benedictus - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (6):589-593.
A Philosopher Looks at String Theory.Robert Weingard - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:95 - 106.


Added to PP

953 (#14,865)

6 months
203 (#13,717)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Cabrera
University of Wisconsin, Madison (PhD)

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 119 references / Add more references