Synthese:1-29 (2018)

Authors
Frank Cabrera
Milwaukee School of Engineering
Abstract
In this paper, I offer an analysis of the radical disagreement over the adequacy of string theory. The prominence of string theory despite its notorious lack of empirical support is sometimes explained as a troubling case of science gone awry, driven largely by sociological mechanisms such as groupthink (e.g. Smolin 2006). Others, such as Dawid (2013), explain the controversy by positing a methodological revolution of sorts, according to which string theorists have quietly turned to nonempirical methods of theory assessment given the technological inability to directly test the theory. The appropriate response, according to Dawid, is to acknowledge this development and widen the canons of acceptable scientific methods. As I’ll argue, however, the current situation in fundamental physics does not require either of these responses. Rather, as I’ll suggest, much of the controversy stems from a failure to properly distinguish the “context of justification” from the “context of pursuit”. Both those who accuse string theorists of betraying the scientific method and those who advocate an enlarged conception of scientific methodology objectionably conflate epistemic justification with judgements of pursuit-worthiness. Once we get clear about this distinction and about the different norms governing the two contexts, the current situation in fundamental physics becomes much less puzzling. After defending this diagnosis of the controversy, I’ll show how the argument patterns that have been posited by Dawid as constituting an emergent methodological revolution in science are better off if reworked as arguments belonging to the context of pursuit.
Keywords String theory  scientific method  explanation  context of justification  context of pursuit  Bayesianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-018-01987-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]University of Chicago Press.

View all 103 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

String Theory and the Scientific Method.Richard Dawid - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Experiment and Theory Building.Lydia Patton - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):235-246.
String Theory and General Methodology: A Mutual Evaluation.Lars-Göran Johansson & Keizo Matsubara - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (3):199-210.
String and M-Theory: Answering the Critics. [REVIEW]M. J. Duff - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (1):182-200.
Doubts for Dawid's Non-Empirical Theory Assessment.Cristin Chall - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63:128-135.
String Theory & the Scientific Method.Fedde Benedictus - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (6):589-593.
A Philosopher Looks at String Theory.Robert Weingard - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:95 - 106.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-19

Total views
245 ( #33,619 of 2,386,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #16,112 of 2,386,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes