Hypatia 29 (4):840-856 (2014)

Ann Cahill
Elon College
With its implicit vilification of materiality, the notion of objectification has failed to produce a coherent and effective ethical analysis of heterosexual sex work. The concept of derivatization, grounded in an Irigarayan model of embodied intersubjectivity, is more effective. However, queer sex work poses new and different ethical challenges. This paper argues that although queer sex work can entail both objectification and derivatization, the former is not ethically objectionable, and the latter, although the cause for some justified ethical concern, must be analyzed within the context of structural sexual injustice
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12111
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

This Sex Which Is Not One.Luce Irigaray - 1985 - Cornell University Press.
An Ethics of Sexual Difference.Luce Irigaray - 1993 - Cornell University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Feminist Perspectives on Sex Markets.Laurie Shrage - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #236,977 of 2,448,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,130 of 2,448,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes