In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press (2006)
For at least two decades, the role of theology in public matters has been governed by what might be termed a “liberal consensus”. This consensus, shared by policymakers, theologians, philosophers, and the public, has two parts. First, that law and public policy need to be considered in terms of individual liberties and rights. Second, that the only appropriate “public” language in which to justify, qualify, and reconcile liberties and rights should be neutral, secular, and rational. The thesis of this chapter is that such a framing of the issues is outmoded. To begin with, the “secular” sphere is not neutral, since all participants inevitably come from communities which have identity. Therefore, it is appropriate to use religious narratives and language, or those of any moral tradition, as long as they are not propounded dogmatically or in a way that undermines democratic process and participatory politics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Between Technocracy and Democratic Legitimation: A Proposed Compromise Position for Common Morality Public Bioethics.John H. Evans - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):213 – 234.
The Role of Health Law, Bioethics, and Human Rights to Promote a Safer and Healthier World.Paula Lobato de Faria (ed.) - 2006 - Fundação Luso-Americana.
Multiple Roles and Successes in Public Bioethics: A Response to the Public Forum Critique of Bioethics Commissions.Summer Johnson - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188.
Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions.Summer Johnson - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
"Show Me" Bioethics and Politics.Myra J. Christopher - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (10):28 – 33.
The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums.Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.
Policy Arguments in a Public Church: Catholic Social Ethics and Bioethics.J. Bryan Hehir - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):347-364.
The Bioethicist as Public Intellectual.Kayhan P. Parsi & Karen E. Geraghty - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):17 – 23.
Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW]William Stempsey - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
Theology and Bioethics: Should Religious Traditions Have a Public Voice?Lisa Sowle Cahill - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):263-272.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?