Assessing Decision-Making Capacity in Patients with Communication Impairments

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):691-699 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:The ethical principle of autonomy requires physicians to respect patient autonomy when present, and to protect the patient who lacks autonomy. Fulfilling this ethical obligation when a patient has a communication impairment presents considerable challenges. Standard methods for evaluating decision-making capacity require a semistructured interview. Some patients with communication impairments are unable to engage in a semistructured interview and are at risk of the wrongful loss of autonomy. In this article, we present a general strategy for assessing decision-making capacity in patients with communication impairments. We derive this strategy by reflecting on a particular case. The strategy involves three steps: (1) determining the reliability of communication, (2) widening the bandwidth of communication, and (3) using compensatory measures of decision-making capacity. We argue that this strategy may be useful for assessing decision-making capacity and preserving autonomy in some patients with communication impairments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,726

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-24

Downloads
30 (#533,137)

6 months
9 (#454,577)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario
Andrew H. Peterson
George Mason University