Trinity and Consistency

Faith and Philosophy 23 (1):45-54 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

P. T. Geach has argued that it is impossible to demonstrate that the doctrine of the Trinity is consistent. I try to show why -- on a common understanding of the notion of consistency -- his reasoning is flawed and why, on Geach’s own principles, one should expect that if the doctrine of the Trinity is true then it will be possible to prove that the doctrine is consistent, and it will be possible to do this in a way that makes no appeal to the truth of any religious doctrine

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Has Trinitarianism Been Shown to Be Coherent?E. Feser - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):87-97.
On the Geachian Theory of the Trinity And Incarnation.James Cain - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (4):474-486.
"God's Only Begotten Son": A Reply to R. T. Mullins.William Hasker - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (4):217-237.
Trinity and Polytheism.Edward Wierenga - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):281-294.
Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity.Michael C. Rea - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):431 - 445.
Rethinking the Trinity.Chad Meister - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):271-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
481 (#47,404)

6 months
92 (#74,795)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cain
Oklahoma State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references