The Kane-Widerker Objection to Frankfurt Examples

Philosophia 42 (4):949-957 (2014)
I will argue that the Kane-Widerker objection to Frankfurt examples is much weaker than is generally recognized. The Kane-Widerker objection holds that proponents of Frankfurt examples beg the question against incompatibilist accounts of free and responsible action by constructing examples that tacitly assume a compatibilist account of moral responsibility; that is, they assume that one can have non-derivative responsibility for choices that were not undetermined prior to their occurrence. The notion of an event, E, being ‘undetermined prior to its occurrence’ is ambiguous. It can mean either (1) with respect to each time t prior to E’s occurrence, it is not the case that at t E’s occurrence is determined to take place, or it can mean (2) with respect to the whole collection of times prior to E’s occurrence, E’s occurrence is not determined to take place. Kane’s argument shows that (under certain constraints) if a choice is to be undetermined (in the second sense) prior to its occurrence, then a prior-sign Frankfurt example cannot be successful. But he fails to show that prior-sign Frankfurt examples cannot be constructed in which the choice is undetermined (in the first sense) prior to its occurrence, and he would need to do so in order to sustain his charge that those using Frankfurt examples beg the question against traditional incompatibilist accounts of responsibility. Widerker’s argument avoids the above problem, but at the cost of only applying to a rather restricted set of Frankfurt examples
Keywords Frankfurt example  Free choice  Kane/Widerker objection  Principle of alternate possibilities  Moral responsibility  Undetermined action
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-014-9542-x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Living Without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Asymmetry.Daniel Avi Coren - 2018 - Acta Analytica 33 (2):145-159.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Indeterminism and Frankfurt-Type Examples.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (1):42-58.
Three Recent Frankfurt Cases.Robert Lockie - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):1005-1032.
Pereboom's Frankfurt Case and Derivative Culpability.Nadine Elzein - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):553-573.
Free Will and Probability.Danny Frederick - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):60-77.
Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases.Alfred R. Mele & David Robb - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (1):97-112.
Indeterminism, Explanation, and Luck.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (3):211-235.
Responsibility and Frankfurt-Type Examples.David Widerker - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Moral Responsibility and Omissions.Jeremy Byrd - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):56–67.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
112 ( #51,476 of 2,237,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #21,516 of 2,237,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature