Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair

Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338 (1980)
Abstract
The ethical foundations of the “animal liberation” movement are compared with those of Aldo Leopold’s “land ethic,” which is taken as the paradigm for environmental ethics in general. Notwithstanding certain superficial similarities, more profound practical and theoretical differences are exposed. While only sentient animals are moraIly considerable according to the humane ethic, the land ethic includes within its purview plants as weIl as animals and even soils and waters. Nor does the land ethic prohibit the hunting, killing, and eating ofcertain animal species, in sharp contrast to the humane ethic. The humane ethic rests upon Benthamic foundations: pain is taken to be the ultimate evil and it is reductive or atomistic in its moral focus. The land ethic, on the other hand, is holistic in the sense that theintegrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community is its summum bonum. A classical antecedent of some of the formal characteristics of the land ethic is found in Plato’s moral philosophy. Special consideration is given to the differing moral status of domestic and wild animals in the humane and land ethics and to the question of moral vegetarianism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI enviroethics19802424
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dimensions of Naturalness.Helena Siipi - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 71-103.
Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
We Should Not Manipulate the Genome of Domestic Hogs.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):177-185.
The Role of Rules in Ethical Decision Making.Eugene C. Hargrove - 1985 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):3 – 42.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Animal Liberation Versus the Land Ethic.Edward Johnson - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (3):265-273.
Animal Liberation Versus the Land Ethic.Edward Johnson - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (3):265-273.
Environmental Ethics and the Case for Hunting.Roger J. H. King - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (1):59-85.
Animal Rights and Human Needs.Angus Taylor - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
Animal Rights and Human Needs.Angus Taylor - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
Toward an Earth Ethic.J. Baird Callicott - 2010 - Dialogue and Universalism 20 (11-12):21-32.
Holists and Fascists and Paper Tigers...Oh My!Michael P. Nelson - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):103 - 117.
Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total downloads
1 ( #1,008,202 of 2,237,282 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #443,963 of 2,237,282 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
My notes
Sign in to use this feature