Engineering and Biology: Counsel for a Continued Relationship

Biological Theory 10 (1):50-59 (2015)
Authors
Arnon Levy
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Brett Calcott
Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
Biologists frequently draw on ideas and terminology from engineering. Evolutionary systems biology—with its circuits, switches, and signal processing—is no exception. In parallel with the frequent links drawn between biology and engineering, there is ongoing criticism against this cross-fertilization, using the argument that over-simplistic metaphors from engineering are likely to mislead us as engineering is fundamentally different from biology. In this article, we clarify and reconfigure the link between biology and engineering, presenting it in a more favorable light. We do so by, first, arguing that critics operate with a narrow and incorrect notion of how engineering actually works, and of what the reliance on ideas from engineering entails. Second, we diagnose and diffuse one significant source of concern about appeals to engineering, namely that they are inherently and problematically metaphorical. We suggest that there is plenty of fertile ground left for a continued, healthy relationship between engineering and biology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13752-014-0198-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history
Admin Source id: crossref://J:10.1007:56407/doi/10.1007/s13752-014-0198-3   Serial ID: 1828791
Change log    Delete without trace    Inspect

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Strategy of Model-Based Science.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):725-740.
Who is a Modeler?M. Weisberg - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):207-233.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Engineering and Evolvability.Brett Calcott - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (3):293-313.
Engineering Design and Adaptation.Robert C. Richardson - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1277-1288.
Synthetic Biology and its Alternatives. Descartes, Kant and the Idea of Engineering Biological Machines.Werner Kogge & Michael Richter - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2):181-189.
Basic Science Through Engineering? Synthetic Modeling and the Idea of Biology-Inspired Engineering.Tarja Knuuttila & Andrea Loettgers - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2):158-169.
The Place of Engineering and the Engineering of Place.Gene Moriarty - 2000 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (2):83-96.
Preface: Ethical Issues in Biomedical Engineering.Subrata Saha - 2013 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 4 (1):27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-20

Total downloads
9 ( #531,565 of 2,261,209 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,246 of 2,261,209 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature