Explaining Time's Arrow

Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis is an attempt to accurately formulate and solve one of the problems associated with the direction of time. Processes in nature appear to be 'irreversible', for instance, heat flows from hot to cold but never from cold to hot. The problem of the direction of time, roughly put, is the difficulty of squaring this irreversible behavior with the apparent fact that the fundamental laws of physics are completely reversible. ;In the first three chapters I critically review the foundations of statistical mechanics. After arguing that entropy is an objective property of the thermodynamic world, I contrast the 'Boltzmannian' single-system approach to statistical mechanics with the 'Gibbsian' many-system approach. Based in part on its ability to handle irreversibility, I judge the Boltzmann approach to be superior from a philosophical perspective. I argue, however, that the statistical mechanical probabilities cannot be interpreted in such a way as to allow the theory to give the sort of explanation originally desired. ;The next four chapters are devoted to the direction of time. Chapters four and five attempt to provide the problem with the philosophically mature geography that has so far eluded it. Chapter six discusses the problem in the context of quantum mechanics, and chapter seven criticizes the problem's standard formulation. I show that the problem is really a much more general one than has previously been appreciated; indeed, I try to show that it is a problem afflicting all the special sciences. ;Finally, the remaining three chapters investigate three separate issues. Chapter eight discusses the tensed theory of time. I claim the best argument for the tensed theory relies on various temporal asymmetries, e.g., the asymmetry of causation. I provide reasons for not being persuaded by this argument. The tensed theory, I conclude, is not incoherent, as many have claimed, instead it is simply an implausible explanation of our experience. Chapter nine examines the possibility that quantum mechanics implies our world is temporally anisotropic, and chapter ten looks at some conceptual difficulties associated with our conception of time reversal invariance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
2 (#1,787,337)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Craig Callender
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Time Reversal.Bryan W. Roberts - 2022 - In Eleanor Knox & Alastair Wilson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. London, UK: Routledge.
Is Time Handed in a Quantum World?Craig Callender - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):247-269.
Review article. The view from no-when.Craig Callender - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):135-159.
The view from no-when. [REVIEW]Craig Callender - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):135 - 159.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references