Keeping score: the consequential critique of religion [Book Review]
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):231-246 (2011)
This essay attempts to specify just what one would need to show in order to draw any substantive conclusion about religion’s consequential value. It is focused on three central questions: (1) What exactly is being evaluated? (2) What benefits and harms are relevant? (3) How are the relevant benefits and harms to be assessed? Each of these questions gives rise to a range of thorny philosophical and empirical issues, and any thesis about religion’s ultimate consequential value will therefore be contingent on a range of rationally contestable assumptions and stipulations. Consequently, one should not take it as “obvious” that religion is a harmful social force, or that the world would be better off without it. Such claims require much more empirical research and philosophical reflection than they have received thus far. Thus, while we can point to a few clear cases of religiously-produced harm and benefit, we do not yet know what religion’s ultimate consequential value is, as counter-intuitive as that may seem
|Keywords||Religion Consequences Social science Value Benefits Harms Comparison|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering.Eleonore Stump - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason.Amartya Sen - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (9):477-502.
Dawkins' God Less Delusion.J. Angelo Corlett - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):125 - 138.
Citations of this work BETA
An Apology for the “New Atheism”.Andrew Johnson - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (1):5-28.
Similar books and articles
Utility Conditionals as Consequential Arguments: A Random Sampling Experiment.Jean-François Bonnefon - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):379 - 393.
Strong Boethius' Thesis and Consequential Implication.Claudio Pizzi & Timothy Williamson - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):569-588.
Consequential Implication. A Correction To: ``Decision Procedures for Logics of Consequential Implication''.Claudio Pizzi - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):621-624.
Aristotle's Cubes and Consequential Implication.Claudio Pizzi - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):143-153.
Feminist Social Criticism and Marx's Theory of Religion.Amy Newman - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (4):15 - 37.
Religion and the Human Mind: Philosophical Perspectives on the Cognitive Science of Religion.Aku Visala - 2008 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 50 (2):109-130.
The Faith Instinct: How Religion Evolved and Why It Endures.Nicholas Wade - 2009 - Penguin Press.
Second-Order Equality and Levelling Down.Re'em Segev - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):425 – 443.
On the Distinction Between “Sensorimotor” and “Motorsensory” Contingencies.Donald Laming - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):992-992.
Added to index2011-06-20
Total downloads31 ( #163,812 of 2,158,461 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,692 of 2,158,461 )
How can I increase my downloads?