Journal of Philosophical Research 19:51-60 (1994)
In dealing with concern for fellow human beings, sentient animals, and the enviroment, Christopher D. Stone suggests that a single agent adopt a different ethical theory---e.g., Kant’s, Bentham’s, Leopold’s---for each domain. Ethical theories, however, and their attendant rules and principles are embedded in moral philosophies. Employing Kant’s categorical imperative in this case, Bentham’s hedonic caIculus in that, and Leopold’s land ethic in another, a single agent would therefore have either simultaneously or cyclically to endorse contradictory moral philosophies. Instead, I suggest that different and sometimes conflicting duties and obligations are generated by an agent’s membership in multiple moral communities. Peter Wenz, Gary Varner, Andrew Brennan, Anthony Weston, and Eugene Hargrove, among others, variously misunderstand either what is at issue in the monism versus pluralism debate in environmental ethics or my suggested communitarian altemative to the sort of pluralism that Stone recommends
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Making and Finding Values in Nature: From a Humean Point of View.Y. S. Lo - 2006 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):123 – 147.
Western Environmental Ethics: An Overview.Kathie Jenni - 2005 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (1):1–17.
Similar books and articles
Minimal, Moderate, and Extreme Moral Pluralism.Peter S. Wenz - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):61-74.
Callicott and Naess on Pluralism.Andrew Light - 1996 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):273 – 294.
The Demise of Monism and Pluralism in Environmental Ethics.Wim J. van der Steen - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):209-220.
The Land Ethic and Callicott's Ethical System (1980-2001): An Overview and Critique.Y. S. Lo - 2001 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):331 – 358.
Moral Pluralism, Skillful Means, and Environmental Ethics.William Edelglass - 2006 - Environmental Philosophy 3 (2):8-16.
Ecological Morality and Nonmoral Sentiments.Ernest Partridge - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):149-163.
Moral Pluralism and the Course of Environmental Ethics.Christopher D. Stone - 1988 - Environmental Ethics 10 (2):139-154.
Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Deliberating Animal Values: A Pragmatic—Pluralistic Approach to Animal Ethics. [REVIEW]Frank Kupper & Tjard Cock Bunindeg - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):431-450.
Why I Am Not a Nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism.Bryan G. Norton - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (4):341-358.
Pragmatism in Practice: The Efficiency of Sustainable Agriculture.Peter S. Wenz - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):391-410.
A Defense of Environmental Ethics: A Reply to Janna Thompson.Michael P. Nelson - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (3):245-257.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads25 ( #205,410 of 2,178,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,027 of 2,178,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?