In Christopher Burr & Luciano Floridi (eds.), Ethics of Digital Well-being: A Multidisciplinary Approach. (forthcoming)

Authors
Karina Vold
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
Autonomy has been central to moral and political philosophy for millenia, and has been positioned as a critical aspect of both justice and wellbeing. Research in psychology supports this position, providing empirical evidence that autonomy is critical to motivation, personal growth and psychological wellness. Responsible AI will require an understanding of, and ability to effectively design for, human autonomy (rather than just machine autonomy) if it is to genuinely benefit humanity. Yet the effects on human autonomy of digital experiences are neither straightforward nor consistent, and are complicated by commercial interests and tensions around compulsive overuse. This multi-layered reality requires an analysis that is itself multidimensional and that takes into account human experience at various levels of resolution. We borrow from HCI and psychological research to apply a model (“METUX”) that identifies six distinct spheres of technology experience. We demonstrate the value of the model for understanding human autonomy in a technology ethics context at multiple levels by applying it to the real-world case study of an AI-enhanced video recommender system. In the process we argue for the following three claims: 1) There are autonomy-related consequences to algorithms representing the interests of third parties, and they are not impartial and rational extensions of the self, as is often perceived; 2) Designing for autonomy is an ethical imperative critical to the future design of responsible AI; and 3) Autonomy-support must be analysed from at least six spheres of experience in order to approriately capture contradictory and downstream effects.
Keywords human autonomy  artificial intelligence  targeting  recommender systems  self-determination theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Autonomy.Richard Alterman - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):15-30.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Intention, Autonomy, and Brain Events.Grant Gillett - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):330-339.
Kant's Conception of Personal Autonomy.Paul Formosa - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (3):193-212.
Secondary-Cause Autonomy and Divine Motivation.Christian Schröer - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (3):75--92.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-11

Total views
828 ( #6,319 of 2,432,205 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #4,914 of 2,432,205 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes