Hypatia 16 (2):67-74 (2001)
: Linda Nicholson argues that because gender is socially constructed, feminist theorizing must be about an expansive multiplicity of subjects called "woman" that bear a family resemblance to each other. But why did feminism expand its category of analysis to apply to all cultures and time periods when social constructionism led lesbian and gay studies to narrow the categories "homosexual" and "lesbian"? And given the multiplicity of genders, why insist that feminist subjects are different, resembling women rather than a multiplicity including women as well as not-women and not-men?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought.Elizabeth Spelman - 1988 - Beacon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The New Men's Studies: From Feminist Theory to Gender Scholarship.Harry Brod - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (1):179 - 196.
Asymmetrical Genders: Phenomenological Reflections on Sexual Difference.Silvia Stoller & tr Nielsen, Camilla - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (2):7-26.
The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy.Linda Alcoff & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.) - 2007 - Blackwell.
Intersectionality, Metaphors, and the Multiplicity of Gender.Ann Garry - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (4):826-850.
Je, Tu, Nous: Toward a Culture of Difference: With a Personal Note by the Author.Luce Irigaray - 2007 - Routledge.
The Politics of Women's Studies and Men's Studies.Mary Libertin - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):143 - 152.
Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement.Cheshire Calhoun - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Anthropological, Social, and Moral Limitations of a Multiplicity of Genders.Hilge Landweer & Gertrudetr Postl - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (2):27-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads94 ( #53,159 of 2,153,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,516 of 2,153,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?