The hypothesis of ether and Reid's interpretation of Newton's first rule of philosophizing

Synthese 120 (1):19-26 (1999)
My object is to question a recurrent claim made to the point that Thomas Reid (1710–1796) was hostile to ether theories and that this hostility had its source in his distinctive interpretation of the first of Newton's regulæ philosophandi. Against this view I will argue that Reid did not have any quarrel at all with unobservable or theoretical entities as such, and that his objections against actual theories concerning ether were scientific rather than philosophical, even when based on Newton's first rule. I argue further that Reid's insistence on Newton's rule concerns, not direct observation, but rather the notion of explanation itself.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Metaphysics   Philosophy of Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005250302365
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reid and the Newtonian Forces of Attraction.Robert Callergård - 2005 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):139-155.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reid on Consciousness: Hop, Hot or For?Rebecca Copenhaver - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):613-634.
The Problem with Reid's Direct Realism.Todd Buras - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):457-477.
What Sort of Epistemological Realist Was Thomas Reid?Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2006 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (2):111-124.
Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They?Quayshawn Spencer - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (4):759-782.
How to Reid Moore.John Greco - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):544-563.
Atoms and the 'Analogy of Nature': Newton's Third Rule of Philosophizing.J. E. McGuire - 1970 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 1 (1):3-58.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
34 ( #156,567 of 2,198,883 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,198,883 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature