No one conception of time emerges from a study of physics. As science changes—over time or through varying interpretations at a time—our conception of physical time changes. Each of these changes and resulting theories of time has been the subject of philosophical scrutiny, so there are many philosophical controversies internal to particular physical theories. For instance, the move to special relativity radically transformed our understanding of time, but it also gave rise to debates about the nature of simultaneity within the theory itself. Nevertheless, there are some philosophical puzzles that appear at every stage of the development of physics. Perhaps most generally, there is the perennial question, Is there a ‘gap’ between the conception of time as found in physics and the conception of time as found in philosophy?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time.Étienne Klein - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):203-221.
The Structure of Praxis and the Time of Eudaimonia.David Webb - 2010 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):265-287.
Time in Thermodynamics.Jill North - 2011 - In Criag Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 312--350.
What "Becomes" in Temporal Becoming?James Harrington - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):249-265.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads261 ( #12,570 of 2,163,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #44,476 of 2,163,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?