Winch on Following a Rule: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Oakeshott

Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 18 (2):167-175 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peter Winch famously critiqued Michael Oakeshott's view of human conduct. He argued that Oakeshott had missed the fact that truly human conduct is conduct that 'follows a rule.' This paper argues that, as is sometimes the case with Oakeshott, what seems, on the surface, to be a disagreement with another, somewhat compatible thinker about a matter of detail in some social theory in fact turns out to point to a deeper philosophical divide. In particular, I contend, Winch, as typical of those who only picked up on Oakeshott's work in the 1940s and 1950s, when Oakeshott became known for his critique of rationalism, failed to understand the idealist metaphysics underlying that critique

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-05

Downloads
268 (#79,035)

6 months
52 (#90,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gene Callahan
State University of New York (SUNY)

Citations of this work

Themed issue on Oakeshott.Gene Callahan & Leslie Marsh - 2014 - Cosmos + Taxis 1 (3).

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Idea of a Social Science.Alasdair MacIntyre & D. R. Bell - 1967 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 41 (1):95-132.
Following a Rule.Colwyn Williamson - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (250):487 - 504.

Add more references