Analogy Counterarguments: A Taxonomy for Critical Thinking [Book Review]

Argumentation 18 (2):223-238 (2004)
The presentation of analogical arguments in the critical thinking literature fails to reflect cognitive research on analogy. Part of the problem is that these treatments of analogy do not address counterarguments, an important aspect of the analysis of analogical argumentation. In this paper, I present a taxonomy of four counterarguments, false analogy, misanalogy, disanalogy, and counteranalogy, analyzed along two dimensions, orientation and effect. The counterarguments are treated in the framework of the multiconstraint theory of analogy (Holyoak and Thagard, 1995). This framework is also extended to account for the evidence brought to light by the consideration of counterarguments. The result is a psychologically motivated treatment of analogical arguments that will be useful both for critical and pedagogical purposes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024025.45062.24
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,208
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Analogy Counterarguments and the Acceptability of Analogical Hypotheses.Cameron Shelley - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):477-496.
Empathy and Analogy.Allison Barnes & Paul R. Thagard - 1997 - Dialogue 36 (4):705-720.
The Analogical Mind.Keith J. Holyoak & P. Thagard - 1997 - American Psychologist 52:35-44.
Analogy and Confirmation Theory.Mary Hesse - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (4):319-327.
What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?Kenneth Olson & Gilbert Plumer - 2002 - In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Analogy and Understanding.Jiri Syrovatka - 2000 - Theoria 15 (3):435-450.
The Role of Focus in Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy.Antonio Donato - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

21 ( #238,244 of 2,172,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums