Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge
Harvard University Press (2002)
Abstract
To attribute confusion to someone is to take up a paternalistic stance in evaluating his reasoning.Call number
BD171.C35 2002
ISBN(s)
9780674006201 0674015916 0674006208
DOI
10.1215/00318108-2007-017
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Theory of Knowledge Course: Syllabus and Teachers' Notes.Richard C. Whitfield (ed.) - 1976 - Department of Education, University of Aston in Birmingham [for] the International Baccalaureate Office.
The knowledge argument revisited.James P. Moreland - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):218-228.
Theories of Knowledge: Its Validity and its Sources.Vēlūri Subbārāvu - 1998 - Sri Satguru Publications.
Value-Judgements and Values.Abdullah Kaygi - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:97-102.
Confusion: A study in the theory of knowledge.James B. Freeman - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (3):651-653.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
63 (#190,807)
6 months
4 (#182,797)
2009-01-28
Downloads
63 (#190,807)
6 months
4 (#182,797)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Replacing truth.Kevin Scharp - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):606 – 621.
Truth and Falsehood: An Inquiry Into Generalized Logical Values.Yaroslav Shramko & Heinrich Wansing - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Illusion of transparency.Laura Schroeter - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):597 – 618.
