Inwardness and Sociability: A Reply to Carter

Philosophical Investigations 37 (1):57-77 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Carter argues that Wittgensteinian moral philosophy – typified by the work of Raimond Gaita and Christopher Cordner – rests on shaky foundations because it vacillates between grounding moral judgements in grammar and in a form of life. In this article, I respond to Carter's criticism. I defend Wittgensteinian moral philosophy by showing that Gaita and Cordner specifically repudiate the purported dichotomy between grammar and a form of life. I then go on to explain why Wittgensteinian moral philosophers are right not to try to ground moral judgements in features of a shared form of life



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Morality and a Scaffolding of Facts.Drew Carter - 2014 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (1):78-90.
“Part of the Very Concept”: Wittgensteinian Moral Philosophy1.Drew Carter - 2013 - Philosophical Investigations 36 (1):37-55.
Gaita's Moral Philosophy and the Rational Soul.Stephen Buckle - 2013 - Philosophical Investigations 36 (4):285-302.
Carter on anthropic principle predictions.Patrick A. Wilson - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):241-253.
The wisdom of the pack.Neil Levy - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):99 – 103.


Added to PP

25 (#465,251)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Campbell
Kyoto University

Citations of this work

Morality and a Scaffolding of Facts.Drew Carter - 2014 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (1):78-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references