Mark Twain, Argumentation Theorist

Abstract

Commentators have read Twain’s Is Shakespeare Dead? as the strained work of a man worried about his own literary legacy. But it is actually an essay about argumentation. Twain writes about the burden of argument, premise relevance, understanding and inference, and norms and practices of argumentation. I will argue that what is taken to be a thoroughgoing cynicism on Twain’s part is best understood as a thoughtful scepticism about the scope of reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Mark Twain: Social Critic.Philip S. Foner, Mark Twain & Charles Neider - 1960 - Science and Society 24 (2):180-183.
Mark Twain and the Feminine Aesthetic.Peter Stoneley - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
Mark Twain and the Limits of Power: Emerson's God in Ruins.James Lyn Johnson - 1982 - Knoxville : University of Tennessee Press.
Mark Twain in the Company of Women.Laura E. Skandera Trombley - 1997 - University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mark Twain's Moral Realism: Ethics and Dialogics.Joe Boyd Fulton - 1995 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
The self.John Perry - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
What is man?Mark Twain - 1906 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-20

Downloads
6 (#1,430,516)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references