Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):25-35 (2011)

Abstract
Responsible leadership is rare. It is not that most leaders are irresponsible, but responsibility in leadership is frequently defined so that an important connotation of responsible leadership is ignored. This article equates responsible leadership with virtuousness. Using this connotation implies that responsible leadership is based on three assumptions—eudaemonism, inherent value, and amplification. Secondarily, this connotation produces two important outcomes—a fixed point for coping with change, and benefits for constituencies who may never be affected otherwise. The meaning and advantages of responsible leadership as virtuous leadership are discussed
Keywords Virtuousness  Leadership  Responsible leadership  Virtuous leadership  Ethics  Virtues
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1023-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Perspectives of Managerial Ethical Leadership.Georges Enderle - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):657 - 663.
Leadership Ethics: Mapping the Territory.Joanne B. Ciulla - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1):5-28.
Moral Leadership: An Overview. [REVIEW]Al Gini - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):323-330.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-09-27

Total views
198 ( #42,456 of 2,330,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #81,798 of 2,330,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes