Abstract
In 2012, two major professional societies representing Europe and the United States released influential statements that would propel a commercial market for social egg freezing, in which women bank their oocytes for later use in order to avoid compromised fertility that comes with age. While the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology condoned SEF based on reproductive autonomy and justice, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine discouraged SEF based on insufficient data and concerns about false hope. In this article, we map the contexts and discursive moves by which the biomedicalization of SEF proceeded since 2012. We compare professional bioethical arguments that made the case to approve SEF in Europe with news and popular media discourse that formed and shaped the commercial marketization of SEF in the United States despite the recommendation of the ASRM. While a statist pronatalist perspective informed the former, a distinctly private labor market recruitment strategy utilizing a Lean In efficiency model of feminism buttressed the latter.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0162243918754322
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Do Our Interns Know About Journalism Ethics?Don Fry - 1989 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (2):186 – 192.
Social Responsibility Worldwide.Clifford Christians & Kaarle Nordenstreng - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):3 – 28.
Competing Moral Visions: Ethics and the Stealth Bible.Ken Waters - 2001 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (1):48-61.
Ethics in Popular Culture.June O'Connor - 2004 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 24 (2):3-23.
Journalism, Ethics, and the Public Interest.Jeremy Franklin Iggers - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-24

Total views
1 ( #1,495,169 of 2,445,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes