The Prohibition Against Psychologizing

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 15 (1):53-66 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The prohibition against psychologizing has been a source of confusion to many Randians. Psychologizing is the practice of incorrectly or improperly inferring motives in other people instead of rendering moral judgment. Rand thought that it could manifest in two ways: inquisitorial and excuse-making. However, Rand's concrete examples are preponderantly of the excuse-making type; her bright line between psychology and philosophy is unsuccessfully drawn; and in offering extended, strongly condemnatory analyses of the supposed motives behind psychologizing, she yields to the very temptation she claims to warn against. “Psychologizing” turns out to be an anticoncept.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
16 (#1,056,769)

6 months
8 (#786,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reflections on My Hero, Nathaniel Branden.Roger E. Bissell - 2016 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 16 (1-2):98-105.
The Man Who Would Be Galt. [REVIEW]Dennis C. Hardin - 2020 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 20 (2):161-300.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Peikovian Doctrine of the Arbitrary Assertion.Robert L. Campbell - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (1):85-170.
Ayn Rand and the cognitive revolution in psychology.Robert L. Campbell - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):107-134.

Add more references