The unjustified-suffering argument for vegetarianism
A major argument for vegetarianism is that eating animals causes unjustified suffering. While this argument has been articulated by several people, it has received surprisingly little attention. Here I restate it in a way that I believe is most convincing, considering and rejecting the two main justifications for causing suffering in order to eat animals. I compare it to some other prominent arguments for vegetarianism, and discuss a major objection to the argument which focuses on whether the animals would not exist if not bred to be eaten.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Food Fight! Davis Versus Regan on the Ethics of Eating Beef.Andy Lamey - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2):331–348.
Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little?Nathan Nobis - 2002 - Social Theory and Practice 28 (1):135-156.
Deconstruction is Not Vegetarianism: Humanism, Subjectivity, and Animal Ethics.Matthew Calarco - 2004 - Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):175-201.
The Vegetarian Savage: Rousseau's Critique of Meat Eating.David Boonin-Vail - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):75-84.
We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity.Cathryn Bailey - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #134,821 of 2,164,288 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?