Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):163-186 (2009)

Authors
Simon Caney
University of Warwick
Abstract
This paper examines explore the issues of intergenerational equity raised by climate change. A number of different reasons have been suggested as to why current generations may legitimately favor devoting resources to contemporaries rather than to future generations. These - either individually or jointly - challenge the case for combating climate change. In this paper, I distinguish between three different kinds of reason for favoring contemporaries. I argue that none of these arguments is persuasive. My answer in each case appeals to the concept of human rights. It maintains that a human rights-centered perspective to climate change enables us to address each of these reasons
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01445.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,374
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Does Anthropogenic Climate Change Violate Human Rights?Derek Bell - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):99-124.
Climate Change, Intergenerational Equity and the Social Discount Rate.Simon Caney - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):320-342.
Risk.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Climate Ethics: Justifying a Positive Social Time Preference.Joseph Heath - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (4):435–462.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-06-07

Total views
291 ( #28,905 of 2,420,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,806 of 2,420,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes