Charles Lyell, Radical Actualism, and Theory

This is a theoretical paper. A little theory goes a long way in history, for me; but it is good to collect as much as is feasible in one paper, so that gaps and inconsistencies can be noticed. I use ‘theory’ in the definite sense of a set of hypothetical statements such that deductions can be made and compared with data, facts, or generalizations obtained in some other way than as derivation from theory. Deductions need not always be rigorous, and there may be two or more ‘solutions’ obtainable, of which the scientist may choose one and discard the rest . I am ignoring the differences between propositions, demonstrations, problems, and the like. Actually there must always be several statements, including rules of procedure, in the set; but often many are assumed and only the new or controversial one is stated as ‘the’ hypothesis of Mr X
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0007087400014709
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Triumph of the Darwinian Method.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (3):466-467.
Darwin, Malthus, and Selection.Sandra Herbert - 1971 - Journal of the History of Biology 4 (1):209-217.
John Herschel and the Idea of Science.Walter F. Cannon - 1961 - Journal of the History of Ideas 22 (April-June):215-239.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sir John F. W. Herschel and Charles Darwin: Nineteenth-Century Science and Its Methodology.Charles H. Pence - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):108-140.
The Singularity of Lyell.M. Bartholomew - 1979 - History of Science 17 (4):276-293.
Review: Early Victorian Science: "Science in Culture". [REVIEW]S. S. Schweber - 1980 - Journal of the History of Biology 13 (1):121 - 140.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Charles Lyell and the Uniformity Principle.Giovanni Camardi - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):537-560.
The Rivalry Between Charles Lyell and Roderick Murchison.Leroy E. Page - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (2):156-165.
Charles Lyell and the Philosophers of Science.Michael Ruse - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (2):121-131.
Humphry Davy as Geologist, 1805–29.Robert Siegfried & R. H. Dott - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (2):219-227.
Richard Owen's Reaction to Transmutation in the 1830's.Adrian Desmond - 1985 - British Journal for the History of Science 18 (1):25-50.
The Distortion of Werner in Lyell's Principles of Geology.Alexander M. Ospovat - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (2):190-198.
The First Spanish Translation of Lyell's Elements of Geology.J. Ordaz - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (2):237-240.
Charles Lyell Speaks in the Lecture Theatre.Martin J. S. Rudwigk - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (2):147-155.
Defending the Radical Enlightenment.Charles W. Mills - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:9-29.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #821,865 of 2,285,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #839,861 of 2,285,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature