Consequences of pragmatic conceptualism: On the methodology problem in jurisprudence

Ratio Juris 22 (2):171-186 (2009)
Abstract
Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to address some of the main issues of contemporary jurisprudential methodology by considering the contribution of Jules Coleman to this subject. After a description of Coleman's methodological approach and a clarification of its philosophical background, the paper focuses on some related problems, such as the relation between linguistic meaning and conceptual content, the nature of legal concepts, the different aspects of the normativity of content, and the revisability of conceptual truths.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00419.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,687
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Law's Empire.R. DWORKIN - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
The Concept of Law.H. L. A. Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Meaning.Paul Horwich - 1998 - Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Legal Concepts as Inferential Nodes and Ontological Categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.
Is Law Grounded in Joint Action?Damiano Canale - 2014 - Rechtstheorie 45 (3):289-312.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-06-16

Total downloads

22 ( #218,756 of 2,146,220 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #387,123 of 2,146,220 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums