Ratio Juris 29 (2):160-163 (2016)

Damiano Canale
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
The paper introduces the debate, hosted by the present Journal, on Schauer's book The Force of Law. It points out some starting points of the discussion and puts into question the status of contemporary jurisprudence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/raju.12121
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Frederick Schauer on the Force of Rules.Jeremy Elkins - 1999 - In Frederick F. Schauer & Linda Meyer (eds.), Rules and Reasoning: Essays in Honour of Fred Schauer. Hart. pp. 79--108.
Schauer's Anti‐Essentialism.Torben Spaak - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (2):182-214.
The Ambiguity of Force.David Dyzenhaus - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (3):323-347.
Schauer on Precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court.William A. Edmundson - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 24 (2):403-13.
Introduction.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Frederick Schauer - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):251-252.
Overruling Rules?Jonathan Yovel - 1996 - Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (2):347-366.
Everything We Do is Tentative: An Interview with Prof. Frederick Schauer.Bo Zhao - 2010 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 39 (1):67-79.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,246,434 of 2,329,884 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #582,921 of 2,329,884 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes