Authors
Abstract
The aim of this article is to show that the “attestation of evil and testimony of hope” are characterized by the genitive that accompanies them. This places them both, each no less than the other, in two different horizons: while the horizon of attestation is Heideggerian, the horizon of testimony is a legacy of Jean Nabert. Both of these horizons are present in the thought of Ricœur, and characterize the entire spectrum of his work. However, we are not dealing here with a syncretism resulting from the co-presence of a hermeneutic source and of the philosophy of reflection. On the contrary, I attempt to show that the co-presence of attestation and testimony results from the fact that Ricœur never stopped “walking on two legs,” given what he writes in a conversation published in the Critique and Conviction, and that this presence is rooted in Ricœur’s formation, which is at the same time philosophical, literary and biblical, as he never renounced either the former one, or the latter ones.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.35765/forphil.2017.2202.11
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paul Ricoeur: entre attestation du mal et témoignage de l’espérance.Carla Canullo - 2017 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 22 (2):161-174.
Le self dans l’ouvrage de Ricœur Soi-même comme un autre. L’attestation de soi : certitude et fragilité du self.Annie Barthélémy - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (4):431–445.
Towards a “Hermeneutics of Historical Consciousness”? Questioning Ricœur.Catalin Bobb - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (1):154-165.
Du Témoignage Ou de L’Ininterprétable.Emmanuel Alloa - 2015 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 6 (1):94-110.
Ricœur as a Reader of Hegel: Between Defiance and Nostalgia.Gilles Marmasse - 2019 - In Danilo Manca, Elisa Magrì, Dermot Moran & Alfredo Ferrarin (eds.), Hegel and Phenomenology. Springer Verlag. pp. 163-175.
Paul Ricoeur's Surprising Take on Recognition.Arto Laitinen - 2011 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 2 (1):35-50.
Horizons of Expectation. Ricoeur, Derrida, Patočka.Eddo Evink - 2013 - Studia Phaenomenologica 13:297-323.
La conception ricoeurienne de la raison pratique: dialectique ou éclectique?Laurent Jaffro - 2012 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 3 (1):156-171.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-06

Total views
1 ( #1,507,974 of 2,454,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes