Revising the Superorganism: An Organizational Approach to Complex Eusociality

Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Eusociality is broadly defined as: colonies consisting of overlapping generations, cooperative brood care, and a reproductive division of labour where sterile (or non-reproductive) workers help the reproductive members. Colonies of many complex eusocial insect species (e.g. ants, bees, termites) exhibit traits, at the collective level, that are more analogous to biological individuals rather than to groups. Indeed, due to this, colonies of the most complex species are typically a unit of selection, which has led many authors to once again apply the concept of the superorganism to eusocial insects. However, unlike W. M. Wheeler, who originally employed the concept from a physiological and evolutionary perspective, today the superorganism is typically understood only from an evolutionary perspective, using group selection. This is because of the widely held view that eusocial colonies are self-organized systems. According to this view, even the most complex eusocial systems can be explained by appealing to a set of local interactions between parts of an initially disordered system (i.e. self-organization), without the need of any hierarchical control. In this paper we challenge the presupposition that hierarchical control and regulation is not possible in complex eusocial colonies. Using a case study of honey bees (Apis mellifera), we develop an alternative to the self-organization approach, that focuses on the hierarchical nature of the organization of complex eusocial systems—that we refer to as the hierarchical-organizational approach. In addition, we will analyse how colonies of eusocial insects show a complex set of interactions between the different organisms that bring forth a new cohesive collective organization, and how in turn the constitutive entities of this collective organization are transformed in this process. This paper argues that an inter-identity (namely the superorganism) emerges at the collective level in complex eusocial colonies, such as honey bees, due to the hierarchically-organized network of interactions within the colony.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Organizational Functions.Justin Garson - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1093-1103.
Eusociality in History.Laura Betzig - 2014 - Human Nature 25 (1):80-99.
Confucius and the superorganism.Hagop Sarkissian - 2018 - In Philip J. Ivanhoe, Owen Flanagan, Victoria S. Harrison, Hagop Sarkissian & Eric Schwitzgebel (eds.), The Oneness Hypothesis: Beyond the Boundary of Self. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press. pp. 305-320.
Normal injustices and morality in complex organizations.J. Stuart Bunderson - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):181 - 190.
An Approach to Organizational Ethics.Josep M. Lozano - 2003 - Ethical Perspectives 10 (1):46-65.
Why are There No Eusocial Fishes?Klaus M. Stiefel - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (3):204-210.
Practitioner-Based Theory Building in Organizational Ethics.R. P. Nielsen - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):401-406.
Eusociality in History.Laura Betzig - 2014 - Human Nature 25 (1):80-99.
Revising Medical Staff Bylaws: An Organizational Challenge.Nathan Hershey - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (3):139-143.
Revising Medical Staff Bylaws: An Organizational Challenge.Nathan Hershey - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (3):139-143.
Toward a Theory of Organizational Ethics.David Alan Teutsch - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-03

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Argyris Arnellos
University of the Basque Country