The Hart-Fuller debate in the twenty-first century

(ed.)
Portland, Or.: Hart (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book presents the papers and comments on those papers delivered at a colloquium held at the Australian National University in December 2008 to celebrate 50 years since the publication in the Harvard Law Review of the famous and wide-ranging debate between H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

K225.H38 2008

ISBN(s)

9781841138947
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

The common discourse of Hart and Fuller.Ngaire Naffine
How norms become normative.Philip Pettit

Similar books and articles

The legacy of H.L.A. Hart: legal, political, and moral philosophy.Matthew H. Kramer, Claire Grant, Ben Colburn & Antony Hatzistavrou (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Positive and Natural Law Revisited.David-Hillel Ruben - 1972 - Modern Schoolman 49 (4):295-317.
Positivism And The Inseparability Of Law And Morals.Leslie Green - 2008 - New York University Law Review 83:1035--1058.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Hart, Fuller and the connection between law and justice.Jennifer Nadler - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 27 (1):1 - 34.
The "Hart-Dworkin" debate : a short guide for the perplexed.Scott J. Shapiro - 2007 - In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--49.
Legal reasoning and legal theory.Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy.Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-14

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hope and memory in the thought of Judith Shklar.Katrina Forrester - 2011 - Modern Intellectual History 8 (3):591-620.
The Distorted Jurisprudential Discourse of Nazi Law: Uncovering the ‘Rupture Thesis’ in the Anglo-American Legal Academy.Simon Lavis - 2018 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 31 (4):745-770.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references