Exploring ‘Glorious Motherhood’ in Chinese Abortion Law and Policy

Feminist Legal Studies 23 (3):295-318 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Currently, abortion can be lawfully performed in China at any gestational stage for a wide range of social and medical reasons. I critically explore the Chinese regulatory model of abortion in order to examine its practical effects on women. Although I focus on the post-Maoist abortion law, I also analyse the imperial Confucianism-dominated regulation and the Maoist ban on abortion in order to scrutinise the emergence of the notion of ‘glorious motherhood’. By examining how ‘glorious motherhood’ is constructed and reinforced in the Chinese family planning context, I argue that the post-Maoist government intentionally made abortion ‘law in the books’ unrestrictive in order to impose its control over female fertility. As a result of this, women are persuaded and even forced to lead a ‘glorious’ maternal life, which means sacrificing themselves for the purpose of achieving the state’s Malthusian and eugenic demographic goals. Furthermore, I argue that, in addition to exacerbating gender oppression, abortion law’s embrace of the idea of ‘glorious motherhood’ also produces ‘group oppression’ of unmarried women and working-class women.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,245

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion.Margaret Olivia Little - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 313-325.
Kant's Position on the Wide Right to Abortion.Samuel Kahn - 2024 - Kant Studien 115 (2):203-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
73 (#241,731)

6 months
9 (#376,877)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

FLaK: Mixing Feminism, Legality and Knowledge.Ruth Fletcher - 2015 - Feminist Legal Studies 23 (3):241-252.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The rights and wrongs of abortion: A reply to Judith Thomson.John Finnis - 1973 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (2):117-145.
Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection.Mary Anne Warren - 1985 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sex Selection: The Case for.Julian Savulescu - 1999 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 2--145.

View all 14 references / Add more references