Fusions and Ordinary Physical Objects

Philosophical Studies 125 (1):61-83 (2005)
Ben Caplan
Ohio State University
In “Tropes and Ordinary Physical Objects”, Kris McDaniel argues that ordinary physical objects are fusions of monadic and polyadic tropes. McDaniel calls his view “TOPO”—for “Theory of Ordinary Physical Objects”. He argues that we should accept TOPO because of the philosophical work that it allows us to do. Among other things, TOPO is supposed to allow endurantists to reply to Mark Heller’s argument for perdurantism. But, we argue in this paper, TOPO does not help endurantists do that; indeed, we argue that anyone who accepts TOPO should reject endurantism
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Philosophy of Mind   Philosophy of Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-005-7809-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,762
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Parts of Classes.David Lewis - 1991 - Blackwell.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
How Things Persist.Katherine Hawley - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
The Statue and the Clay.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1998 - Noûs 32 (2):149-173.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
468 ( #6,085 of 2,263,217 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #210,087 of 2,263,217 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature